doo.FINANCE compared with Pilot
Where each of us fits — and where we would send you to them.
Pilot is a well-run US bookkeeping and CFO-services firm with a strong brand and a large client base. If you are a US-only startup on QuickBooks, they are a serious option and this page will not pretend otherwise.
The comparison only becomes interesting in one specific situation: your parent company is European, your group runs on Odoo, and your US entity has to consolidate with the rest. That is the case we are built for, and it falls outside what Pilot offers.
Where the two differ
| doo.FINANCE | Pilot | |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting system | Your own Odoo — the ERP your group already runs. | QuickBooks Online. A move to Odoo or NetSuite takes you outside their scope. |
| Non-US entities | Local teams registered in each country we serve. | Foreign entities are excluded from their service. |
| Group consolidation | Consolidation and multi-GAAP handled as part of the engagement. | Not offered — coordinating the group stays with you. |
| Who owns the data | You own the Odoo instance and the ledgers inside it. | Bookkeeping delivered through their platform. |
| Number of partners | One, on both sides of the Atlantic. | One for the US, another for each other country. |
Every statement about Pilot above reflects their own published service scope. Their pricing and packaging change; check their site for current terms.
The question that decides it
Ask how your parent company will consolidate a US ledger that lives in a separate system from the rest of the group. If the answer involves someone mapping a US chart of accounts onto the parent's by hand every month, you have found the cost that does not appear on any price list.
The same question applies to intercompany transactions and transfer pricing. These are not exotic requirements for a European group with a US arm — they are the monthly reality, and they are the part that a US-only provider is not set up to carry.
Why we keep your US entity in Odoo
Your group already chose an integrated ERP. Running the US subsidiary in a separate bookkeeping tool reintroduces exactly the double entry that choice was meant to remove, and it puts the reconciliation burden back on your finance team rather than on your provider.
Keeping the US entity in your own Odoo also means reversibility. The ledgers are in a system you own and can take elsewhere. That is worth stating plainly: the outsourced-bookkeeping market has seen a provider close and leave tens of thousands of clients scrambling for their own books.
Not necessarily. We keep the books and the group reporting in Odoo; where a local filing requires a licensed US preparer, we work alongside one rather than pretending the requirement does not exist.
Only if the rest of your group is on Odoo. If it is, the migration usually pays for itself in the time your team stops spending on monthly re-mapping. If it is not, staying where you are is the reasonable answer.
Yes — that dual view is the reason groups come to us rather than to a US-only provider.
European group with a US entity?
A free first conversation to look at how your group consolidates today.
Book a call